Apple has been criticised used for its
conduct by senior judges by the side of London
The iPhone and iPad maker in print 'false
and misleading' material, Sir Robin Jacob assumed, adding together with the aim
of bosses showed a 'lack of integrity'.
His in black and white statement came in
the same way as Apple was well thought-out to advertise a new to the job
statement on its website acknowledging it had lost an earlier above-board fight
with Samsung.
The judges agreed with the South Korean
company with the aim of Apple's previous notice did not comply with a risk of
Appeal order and ought to take place misused.
'What Apple added was false and
misleading,' Sir Robin assumed.
'There is a false innuendo with the aim of
the UK
The judges spoken disbelief by the side of
the US
'I found with the aim of very alarming:
With the aim of it was past the technical abilities of Apple to put together
the minor changes mandatory to its own website in the sphere of a lesser amount
of stage beggared belief,' Sir Robin added, motto he considered the 48 hours
granted 'generous'.
'We assumed the stage may well take place
extended by an appliance supported by an affidavit from a senior executive
explaining the reasons why further was desired,' he assumed.
'In the event rebuff such appliance was
made.'
He added: 'I expectation with the aim of
the lack of integrity involved in the sphere of this confrontation is entirely
atypical of Apple.'
The other two judges on the situation -
aristocrat Justice Longmore and aristocrat Justice Kitchin - assumed they
agreed with his interpretation.
Apple and Samsung are engaged in the sphere
of a long-running above-board dispute in excess of their tablet computers.
Apple claimed Samsung's Galaxy Tab is too
alike to its iPad and infringes copyright.
But the risk of Appeal upheld the previous
ruling with the aim of Samsung's artifact was not 'cool' as much as necessary
to take place mystified with Apple's.
Give your opinion Birss ruled with the aim
of consumers were not likely to obtain the medicine mystified.
'They work out not take part in the same
understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design,' he
assumed, adding together: 'They are not because cool.'
没有评论:
发表评论